Bad choice: 5 cases in which travel is better not to save

Bad choice: 5 cases in which travel is better not to save

SHARE
Bad choice: 5 cases in which travel is better not to save
All travelers from time to time have to deal with setbacks. The reasons may be different: not all plans succeeded in selected direction disappointed or detained plane. But the most offensive disappointment – when excess savings through the fault of a spoiled tourist travel. When better to overpay than chase the cheap?

Booking a cheap hotel in the boondocks

There’s nothing faster than finding the cheapest hotel and book a room, without delving into the description. Much more time it takes the choice of low-cost and at the same time conveniently located property. So travelers admit mistake of believing that it is better to spend money on transportation than pay for a hotel, where you spend only a few hours a day.

If desired, save better adhere to the following tactics: select all your favorite cheap hotels, and then immediately dismisses those options, next to which there is at least a three-facing sites. Back to the sleeping area after a hard day’s like trying to throw a monkey wrench in the wheel itself. Another advice from experienced travelers: it is better to live in a 1 * hotel in the center than in a 4 * hotel for the same price, but in the suburbs.

Refusal to attend the iconic sights of the high cost of the ticket

Bad choice: 5 cases in which travel is better not to save

All agree that to save for Paris or London and not visit their iconic attractions at least ridiculous. There are exceptions, when you begin to wonder. For example, the Eiffel Tower, to the top of the ticket which will cost 15 euros, and the queue seem endless. But this is a trifle compared with riding a Venetian gondola, where the price starts from 80 euros. Fortunately, most of them hold tickets at $ 10, that the dream of millions is not expensive.

Ignoring bus tours around the city

Bad choice: 5 cases in which travel is better not to save

In any tourist city has its own “city tour” on bright double-decker buses. There are many ways to take these tours and to treat them as “non-self-amusement for travelers,” but a sightseeing tour gives a lot of positive things. First, look at Rome or London on the second floor – it’s always interesting. Secondly, on the first day, you can see the city in all its glory and to quickly navigate. Immediately after the trip easier to decide what I want to see more sights. In some cases, allow tourists to disembark at any stop, walk, and then back on the bus and continue the path.

The choice in favor of fast food, because more local dishes

If the Asian traditional cuisine is available for tourists, in Northern Europe more profitable to buy, such as hamburgers. Save really succeed, but the impressions of the country would be incomplete. After all, the kitchen – the soul of the nation and what makes each individual corner of the Earth. Therefore it is necessary to search for local restaurants. They not only prepare meals for the canonical prescriptions, but also offer the best price.

Bad choice: 5 cases in which travel is better not to save

Buy cheap camping equipment in hopes then to find something more expensive

Good journey is made up of little things. And it is not nice when these little things can ruin a vacation.Probably not the tourist who would not buy a cheap bag on sale the day before the trip, the tent, “one campaign” or shoes that are not a pity to throw away after getting up the hill. But what to do when the lock gets stuck in the middle of the journey, a tent with a minimum of facilities potrepet cool nerves, and shoes natrut feet? Camping gear is better to buy for a long time, not trying to save on your same comfort.

SHARE